Loaded data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\\HL\3.48\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequencesNonCan_13.mat
UUUA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.55, deficit  0.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUCA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.04, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UACA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.98, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUUA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.55, deficit  0.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AGGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.22, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.05, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.22, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.05, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UCUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.80, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
ACAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.77, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.67, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CCAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -7.87, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.94, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GACGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -5.74, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GCUUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CCGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
AUUUU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.10, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GUCUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
AGUAU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.36, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
CCAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -7.87, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -7.16, deficit  3.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.68, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GUGUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAAU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.98, deficit  0.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAUCG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.32, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
UGAAA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.97, deficit  0.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUCUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.84, deficit  0.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
UGGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -6.91, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UAACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -7.10, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.70, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -8.33, deficit  2.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.74, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
CCGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.94, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GAACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUUA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -2.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
UACGA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -5.74, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGCAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -5.63, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CAGUAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.97, deficit  0.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUCGUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.45, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UUAACA 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.59, deficit  4.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.84, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUCAUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -5.02, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CGACAG 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.47, deficit  3.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CACGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -7.13, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
GUUCCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_46463.1,  4 NTs,                UUUCGA,score      -5.16, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.01, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUGUA 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -5.63, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUAAC 1  Matches 36; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.90, deficit  1.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  81.47, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGUGGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUUCUU 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score     -10.29, deficit  7.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.41, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAUAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -7.49, deficit  0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GGCGGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.69, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
AUUCCU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_46463.1,  4 NTs,                UUUCGA,score      -5.15, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAGAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AUACUU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_41285.1,  5 NTs,                GAACUC,score      -5.57, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35                               
CUCGUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.45, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGAUAG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.04, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGAGAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GCAACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -8.35, deficit  2.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CACAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.55, deficit  1.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGAAGC 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.43, deficit  3.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUAACC 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.71, deficit  3.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUGAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_29487.1,  6 NTs,                CUGAUG,score      -2.34, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s35-s55                       
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GUCUUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -3.85, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GAUGCC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_30541.1,  5 NTs,                CAUUCG,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F                             
GCCCAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.24, deficit  0.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGCGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.43, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CAAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.41, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.06, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUGAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_29487.1,  6 NTs,                CUGAUG,score      -2.34, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s35-s55                       
GUGUUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -4.72, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GGAAGC 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.43, deficit  3.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGACAG 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.47, deficit  3.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGUGAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.48, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CGAGAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGGAGG 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.16, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAGGAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.97, deficit  0.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUGUUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -4.72, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CUAACG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.89, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.52, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GGAUAC 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.04, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGCAGG 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.21, deficit  4.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUCAUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -4.95, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CGUAAG 1  Matches 36; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.69, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GUUCUC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score     -10.28, deficit  7.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUCAGUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.77, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
AAACGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.42, deficit  1.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CAAAGAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.29, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
CUUAUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -5.83, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGCAGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -8.13, deficit  0.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
GGGUCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -7.54, deficit  1.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CUGUAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -5.69, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
GGGCGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.63, deficit  3.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CAAUGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.09, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
CCCGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.42, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CGAGAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.29, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
UGGCUAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.06, deficit  2.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CUUGGUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -7.85, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
UGUAGAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.86, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GAAGGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -7.73, deficit  4.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
UCAUUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -8.27, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUACCUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.18, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
GUGAAUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score     -11.28, deficit  4.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GUGUAUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -5.62, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
AAAUCAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.66, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAGCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.98, deficit  0.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
GGAAUGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_40469.1,  4 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -6.18, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CAUUUAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -6.62, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUAAGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.03, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CGAAAAG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.46, deficit  0.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.20, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
CUGUGUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -7.58, deficit  2.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GACAAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.93, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
AUGGUUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -7.30, deficit  1.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35                                 
CUUUACG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -5.69, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
CUGAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.16, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GUUUAUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -6.86, deficit  2.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
AGUCGGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -8.96, deficit  4.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CACAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -7.08, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGUAAAG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.19, deficit  1.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.70, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CUAAAUG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -6.26, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGUGAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.20, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GGAAAGC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.44, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GAAAAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -4.50, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
GCAACUC 1  Matches 12; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score     -10.91, deficit  9.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.09, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUCAAUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.40, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UAGCCGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.97, deficit  2.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GAUACCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -5.03, deficit  2.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.05, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGUGUGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.39, deficit  1.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.40, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
GGUAAGC 1  Matches 19; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.46, deficit  6.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUUGUUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -6.33, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
GCAACUC 1  Matches 12; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score     -10.91, deficit  9.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.09, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AGGUGGU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.33, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.39, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CGCAGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -8.13, deficit  0.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
UAAAUAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.42, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.05, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
AGGAAGU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.22, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GUCGCUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.88, deficit  4.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
CUCUUUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -9.88, deficit  6.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -7.02, deficit  3.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUUUGCCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.42, deficit  3.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGCCAAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.00, deficit  1.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UGAAGAGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -7.96, deficit  4.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUUUUCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_33172.1,  5 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -7.55, deficit  3.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F                   
GUAGAUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -6.98, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CCAUAUAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -5.98, deficit  0.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
GUGACUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -5.96, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
UGUUUGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -8.85, deficit  4.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CACAGACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -6.08, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
UUUCGCUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score     -11.62, deficit  6.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
CGCAAGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -7.59, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUUUCACC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.54, deficit  2.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
CAGGUUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score     -10.91, deficit  3.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
UGUAACAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -8.35, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.73, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUCCGACG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -6.15, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CUUCGCUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score      -9.46, deficit  4.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
CAAGGCAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -11.74, deficit  2.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GGAUGGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -8.12, deficit  5.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
UUGUGUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -10.49, deficit  4.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
CAAGGGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -10.95, deficit  2.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
UGAACGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -9.50, deficit  6.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
AGUGUUAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  2.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GAGGUCGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -8.58, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AUUCGCCU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.34, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GGACCCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -5.55, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GACCGGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -12.64, deficit  5.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.17, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
GUGUAGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -7.23, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.70, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
UUUUGACG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.25, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CGUCUAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -8.99, deficit  4.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
AUAAUGUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score     -10.15, deficit  6.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
UUUGGCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -8.98, deficit  2.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UAUGCGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18495.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -15.24, deficit  9.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGGUGAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -8.12, deficit  3.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
AUUCAGCU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -6.24, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GGAUGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -5.56, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.97, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
AAUUAAGU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -8.15, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
GUUAGAUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -7.50, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.09, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
UACGCCAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -13.57, deficit  4.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CCAGAAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -7.74, deficit  2.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.66, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CGAAUCAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.08, deficit  0.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GGUCCCAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -7.75, deficit  4.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.45, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CCUGCUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18495.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -12.75, deficit  6.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.38, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35             
UGAUUGGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -13.04, deficit  7.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
UGUGGAGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -9.92, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
CACGUGGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score     -10.61, deficit  5.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGCGUCGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.11, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AGAACGAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -7.35, deficit  4.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
GGAAUAAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -8.98, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
GUAGGGCCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.50, deficit  3.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGGAAUCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.33, deficit  2.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAUUGAGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -8.93, deficit  2.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UGUACAAGA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -8.53, deficit  3.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
GUGAAGGCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -9.98, deficit  6.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GGCUUCCGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.97, deficit  7.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AAUGAAUCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -8.25, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.78, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGGCUUGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score     -10.73, deficit  3.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
CUUUAUUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -11.07, deficit  6.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
CGAUUAAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score     -10.10, deficit  3.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
UGAAGGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -13.66, deficit  6.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGAGAAAAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score      -7.84, deficit  0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
CGAGAUCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.27, deficit  2.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
AGUGAUAAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score     -10.73, deficit  4.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
UUGGGGCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -8.60, deficit  2.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.32, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGGGUGAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score     -10.28, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CUUGGAUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.33, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GAGUCUAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -11.79, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
GUGCGGGUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score     -11.38, deficit  4.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
CCUUCGAAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score      -8.15, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.82, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
AUGGUCGCU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -8.99, deficit  3.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
CGGAAAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -8.97, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
GAUCUUAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score      -9.52, deficit  2.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.94, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
CCGAUUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score     -10.38, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.10, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
GGACAGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -6.79, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UAGAUCCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -14.17, deficit  6.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
CUGACUCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -9.35, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
CGCACUUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score      -9.28, deficit  5.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUCGUCUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -10.44, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
GAUCUCACC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.78, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CACCUAUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -12.02, deficit  3.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.27, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAAAAAAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -6.12, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGCAAUAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.89, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAAAUAUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.78, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GGUUUAGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score     -10.66, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
CUAUUCUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.36, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
GGCAUCGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -9.16, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GCUGAAAUC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_59710.7,  9 NTs,             GCUCAUAAC,score      -9.65, deficit  5.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CACCUCUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -12.09, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAACCAAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score     -11.13, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
GAAAGUUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -11.93, deficit  2.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
AUUCCUGUU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_86378.1,  7 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score      -9.05, deficit  2.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH                         
CCCAACCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_58200.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score      -9.27, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
GAGAAAGCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -9.57, deficit  3.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
CUGACCGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -10.46, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
UGUGUGAAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score      -8.29, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
GAGCAGCCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score      -9.77, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
CUAAUUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.90, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GGCAGUUAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score     -11.93, deficit  6.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
GGGAAGAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -9.57, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.17, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUAUGCGAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -12.82, deficit  4.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
GAUAAGGACC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.25, deficit  5.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UGUGUUACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.91, deficit  6.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUUCGUUUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -9.91, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
UGUUGUCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.75, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.93, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
ACGUCUGACU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_15968.1,  8 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -11.47, deficit  6.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.42, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F               
CCUUCGGGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_15968.1,  8 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -9.73, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F               
CGCAGUUCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.11, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.46, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUUACAUGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -12.21, deficit  8.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
GUAGAGUACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -10.88, deficit  4.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUGAAAGAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -14.10, deficit  6.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CGAACGGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -10.70, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAACCACAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.58, deficit  2.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UCAGGAAUAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -11.30, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CUUCAAAGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.15, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GGCAGAAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score      -8.78, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
AUUGCGUAUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -7.28, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
CUAAAGACCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.30, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
UUGAAAUCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -10.59, deficit  6.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CGAUCUUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.15, deficit  6.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.92, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GGAGACAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -10.03, deficit  3.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
UGCAGCCGGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.89, deficit  7.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUGUAUAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.39, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GCCUUUGUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score     -13.52, deficit  7.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GACCUACUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -10.86, deficit  3.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
UCAAUGUGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -11.51, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CCAAGAGAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CACUAAAACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score      -8.06, deficit  0.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.27, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAUCACAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -11.63, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
AGGCUAAAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score     -10.47, deficit  3.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CUGACUGCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -11.88, deficit  4.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAUUAAAAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -10.29, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAAAAUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -10.06, deficit  2.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CCCGAAGAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.60, deficit  2.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.92, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CGAGUGCCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -8.21, deficit  1.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UGAUAGAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -12.57, deficit  4.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGCGAUCCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score      -8.40, deficit  3.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
GAAUACAGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.51, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
UUGAAAGCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -10.59, deficit  6.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
UUGACCAUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -15.64, deficit  8.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCGUUCGACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_33172.1,  5 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score     -12.46, deficit  8.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F                   
UGUGAAAUAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.48, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GUGCCUGAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19239.1,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -13.10, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F                     
GGGAAAGAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -8.05, deficit  2.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
UCGCCGCCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score      -8.25, deficit  0.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.63, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAAAGCUAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.15, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GGUAUCGAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -10.08, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUUGAGUUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.17, deficit  4.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUUAAGUCCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -14.62, deficit  6.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.98, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
UCGUUCUUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94032.1, 10 NTs,          UAGUCUCUUUCG,score     -13.93, deficit  4.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAAAAAUGGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -10.06, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
GUAUGGCUUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score      -9.70, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
GGAGUAGUAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -15.07, deficit  7.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
GUUAAAAUGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -10.28, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.44, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GGACAGAGAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.41, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUGACAUACUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -10.64, deficit  3.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.90, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
AGAAUGUUUGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -17.92, deficit 10.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.28, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCCUUUUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -12.58, deficit  5.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
CAGCUUUUCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -10.23, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
GAAUUAAGAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -11.71, deficit  1.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
UUGAGACUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -15.50, deficit  7.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCAUGGAGUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -13.34, deficit  3.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.42, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
UUGGAUAAGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.04, deficit  6.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.39, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAGGAUAGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -11.58, deficit  1.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.09, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
AUUUAAAAUCU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.30, deficit  5.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CAAGAGCCUAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -12.06, deficit  3.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.92, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
CUUUGGAGCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.13, deficit  4.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.97, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GAUGUAGUUAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -12.33, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
AGAGUGCUUAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -11.45, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
CUCUUUUUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -12.58, deficit  5.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
GAUCCCAGACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -13.95, deficit  4.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGCGAUUAGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -13.60, deficit  6.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.95, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUAGGGUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -13.32, deficit  4.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
AGAAAUUCAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.19, deficit  7.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.99, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCCAAAAGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -14.50, deficit  7.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.32, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
AGCGCUUCUGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -10.96, deficit  3.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGUGCUCGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -13.78, deficit  6.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUGUGAGCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -16.43, deficit  7.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
UAGCUGCAACA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -11.57, deficit  6.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
GCAUCAACUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -13.09, deficit  5.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.90, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
GGUAAGUACGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -15.31, deficit  9.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.78, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAUCGACUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.88, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
AUUUGAUUGUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -10.70, deficit  3.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.18, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
GCCUCAUUAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -11.30, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
CUGUUAAUUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -12.21, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.80, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UAGAAUUUUGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -14.34, deficit  7.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GGAUCCAUCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -11.38, deficit  3.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
CGAGUGCCCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -11.03, deficit  6.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
UGAUAGAGUGAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -12.56, deficit  4.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAACUGUGGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -15.50, deficit  8.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CUGAGUCUAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -14.64, deficit  7.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.02, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
UGUUGUUAGAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -14.99, deficit  6.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.85, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
UGAUCCGUGGGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -15.30, deficit  7.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.95, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGAUGGUUGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -14.60, deficit  5.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
GGAAAUAUCAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -12.22, deficit  5.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.10, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
CUGAGAGAAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -17.65, deficit  9.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUGUAAGUGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score     -12.59, deficit  6.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.52, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
AAGAUCGAUUAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -16.89, deficit  6.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
GGAAUCAUAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.71, deficit  4.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAAUUCGUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -11.95, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
UGAGAGCCCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -17.36, deficit  9.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.28, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
CAUAGAAAAUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.18, deficit  5.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.42, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
CGGUAGCUUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.87, deficit  6.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.77, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCAUUGGUCAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -17.09, deficit  7.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGCGUGUUAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -14.60, deficit  5.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
AGACGAGUUUAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.90, deficit  4.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.90, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGAUAAAGGAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -13.65, deficit  6.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGAUUGUUUAAGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -15.58, deficit  8.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
GUGAAAAGUAACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.24, deficit  6.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGAAGUCGCAAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -12.67, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.58, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
GGACGAUCAAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -14.13, deficit  7.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.06, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
UGAUAAAGAAAAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.69, deficit  6.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.48, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAUCGGCAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -10.64, deficit  2.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
AGGAUCCUGAAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -15.88, deficit  8.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGGUCUGGCUUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68863.1, 11 NTs,         AGGUGGGGUUUAU,score     -12.77, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F   
GAUAGUAAACCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -18.14, deficit  7.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.39, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUCAUGCGCUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -13.96, deficit  4.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.36, ed 99, 4 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
CUAACCGACAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -15.71, deficit  8.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
GGAAAUCGCGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -13.50, deficit  5.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.86, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
UCGGAACCAGUUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -15.08, deficit  4.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.67, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCGCCAGUAGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -15.44, deficit  1.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.44, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
GGUCUUUUCUAUAAAAAGAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_00317.1, 19 NTs,  UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA,score     -28.13, deficit 12.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.13, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 86.3077	 79.3846	4
5	100.0000	 89.0769	 50.4615	23
6	100.0000	 87.5385	 51.5385	60
7	 99.5385	 53.6923	 15.5385	51
8	 99.5385	 28.1538	  4.3077	46
9	 98.6154	 17.6923	  1.6923	68
10	 95.2308	  6.7692	  0.1538	41
11	 82.1538	  3.2308	  0.0000	42
12	 43.2308	  0.4615	  0.0000	23
13	 18.1538	  0.6154	  0.0000	12
14	  5.3846	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.0769	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  1.6923	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.7692	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.6154	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.1538	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  67 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence  99 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence 109 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 160 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 167 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 169 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 179 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 186 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 188 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 191 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 193 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 214 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 223 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 231 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 234 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 235 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 239 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 241 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 244 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 265 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 266 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 272 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 273 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 284 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 294 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 295 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 308 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 308 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 310 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 327 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 328 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 337 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 342 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 356 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 373 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 380 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 383 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 393 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 414 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 417 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 439 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 441 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 448 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 450 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 454 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 460 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 473 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 474 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 495 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 502 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 507 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 511 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 574 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 590 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 600 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 659 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 671 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 677 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 684 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 695 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 701 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 715 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 716 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 718 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 719 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 959 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 960 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 1068 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 1306 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.2564%
Number of models giving false positives is 302 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     8.46
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.56
